Target audience: Civil society groups and reform-minded policymakers across Central Asian  countries 

Policy challenge: How can Central Asia escape the resource curse, leading to more equitable  societies and thus more stable social contracts? 

Context 

When the Soviet Union disintegrated abruptly, leaders of many Central Asian former republics found  themselves in charge of new sovereign states with few checks and balances to their power. The  combination of vast natural resource deposits, autocratic political cultures and  civil repression apparatuses inherited from Soviet times provided a hotbed for oligarchic elite capture.  Further fanning the flames is Central Asia’s geographic position between multiple authoritarian great  powers - China, Russia, Turkey, India and Iran, who in the past generally favoured preserving the  incumbent regimes in exchange for stable energy trade. This imposed stability, however, is vulnerable  to external shocks such as commodity price fluctuations and great power proxy struggles. 

As recently as 2022, factional rivals within Kazakhstan’s regime took advantage of pent up popular  discontent and mobilised civil unrest against political enemies. While the spark was a sharp increase  in petroleum gas prices in the runup to the Invasion of Ukraine, the deadly protests saw the removal of  former president Nazarbayev and his allies from top decision-making circles, but no effective change  in government and its elite capture practices. Before his downfall, Nazarbayev was responsible for  Kazakhstan’s growing economic ties with China under the Belt and Road Initiative, while his successor  pursued more pro-Russian policies notably after he called on Russian-led security forces to crack  down on local protesters. Similar such events have also rocked the sociopolitical fabric of Kyrgyzstan,  Uzbekistan and Tajikistan periodically, incurring mass civilian casualties but leading to no improvement  in social equality and governance transparency. 

Problem statement 

The Central Asian countries have in recent years made some attempts at expanding their trade  relations more internationally but achieved mixed results. At the same time, decreased global  economic integration and intensified great power competition once again threaten to destabilise the  domestic politics of this region. To mitigate the potential for more coups, unrest, state failure or even  civil wars, extensive research is needed to understand how more sustainable economic development  could take place in these countries, and how a more equitable distribution of commodity revenues  could support the legitimacy of stable societies.  

Literature Review 

The literature review of this study focuses on explaining the political culture of the nomadic steppes  and the region’s incomplete processes of state-making. With that, we hope to identify the structural  constraints the region faces, such as dominant cultural values, available natural resources and  geographical positions. We then examine successful precedents of economic diversification and  political transformation across Arab Gulf states and the East Asian Tigers. Through this, we hope to  arrive at applicable political economic policy prescriptions that could help Central Asian countries  escape the "resource-curse" to become more equitable and therefore stable societies. 

Analytical Framework  

Our analysis will involve the comparison between multiple variables and datasets. We plan to  incorporate datasets that display information about the rates of corruption, political fragility, natural  resource dependency, and elite capture (the extent of personalistic controls of energy companies).  These datasets would inform our root cause analysis (RCA) to identify the specific challenges that are  hindering the formation of stable social contracts in the Central Asian region. These datasets include  UN trade statistics, the World Bank’s World Development Indicator and the German Institute of  Development and Sustainability (IDOS)’s Constellations of State Fragility.

To have a better understanding of the Central Asian case study, please check the following interactive dashboards developed by SFDI’s data analysts, Jeanne Brownewell and Wu Yang

First and Second Dashboards

These dashboards use World Bank data on estimates of corruption control (higher numbers - more control of corruption (aka less corrupt)) and natural resources as a percentage of GDP. To learn more about the context, please read this case study about Central Asia.

The first dashboard shows global trends in 2011 and 2021 compared to the trends in the 5 Central Asian countries of interest: Kazakhstan, Kyrygz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. There is a slight negative correlation between corruption control and natural resources as a % of GDP.

The second dashboard presents an interactive scatterplot allowing users to more closely examine the data on a yearly level from 2002-2021. Additionally, line charts for corruption control and natural resource dependency show country-specific trends over these past two decades.

Findings:

●      Turkmenistan had the highest average reliance on natural resources, though it has declined significantly over time. The Kyrgyz Republic and Tajikistan were relatively less dependent.

●      Kazakhstan had the best average corruption control, with signs of gradual improvement over time, despite its significant resource revenue. Turkmenistan had the lowest average for corruption control.

●      Globally, corruption control has very slightly improved and natural resource dependency has slightly lessened in the decade from 2011-2021.

Developer: Jeanne Brownwell

Developer: Jeanne Brownwell

Third Dashboard

Dashboard Overview

This dashboard presents the World Governance Indicators (WGI), which evaluates public perceptions of six dimensions of governance, including civil liberties, political stability, government effectiveness, market-friendliness, the rule of law, and the control of corruption. It allows users to compare scores across multiple countries and over time, serving as a useful first step in understanding the disparities between countries or regions and informing further analysis.

Key Variables and Metrics

The dashboard includes the six WGI indicators, each measured on a percentile ranking system from 0 to 100 that indicates the position of each country relative to all countries in the world. They are:

  1. Voice and Accountability – Measures the extent to which citizens are able to participate in selecting their government, as well as freedom of expression, association, and free media.

  2. Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism – Measures likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism.

  3. Government Effectiveness – Measures quality of public services, the civil service and their independence from political pressures, the quality of policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of the government’s commitment to such policies.

  4. Regulatory Quality – Measures the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development.

  5. Rule of Law – Measures the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence.

  6. Control of Corruption – Measures the extent to which public power is exercised for private gain, including both petty and grand forms of corruption, as well as “capture” of the state by elites and private interests.

The data used in this dashboard is retrieved from the World Bank Group, which compiles the data for the WGI from a diverse set of surveys conducted by think tanks, international organisations, nongovernmental organisations, and private firms.


Developer: Wu Yang

Policy analysts and data analysts of Central Asian team at SFDI